nndamia

to whom it may concern;
this is just me laying down the law, briefly..
for those who are in doubt of their rights and
for those who might end up in similar situations.

the other night, if anything, it was within mr v's rights to sue mr x for assault.
statements like 'i'm going to hit you' and actions like 'holding up a champagne bottle' even if there was no intention to commit or capability of following through, is enough to cause apprehension in mr v.mr x could however sue mr v for battery (direct interfering physical act) but in defence, mr v was assaulted and was in apprehension of battery by mr x and mr v's response was imminent and immediate. so if i were you mr x, i wouldn't make such bold statements of winning a charge and would definitely think twice of even making a case about it.

what happened to settling issues the old school way,what's the fun with legalities and formalities.
get your hands dirty why wont you

song of the day;Joni Mitchell's Both Sides Now. =)

all smiles.